This page has been moved to http://www.outdoorlife.com/blogs/newshound
If your browser doesn’t redirect you to the new location, please visit The Newshound at its new location: www.outdoorlife.com/blogs/newshound.
Scents & Dollars
A lawsuit filed earlier this month in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, Minn. alleges that carbon-activated, odor-eliminating hunting clothing does not perform as advertised and that hunters have been defrauded by the company that produces and licenses it. 
An article by outdoor writer Doug Smith in yesterday’s Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports that four Minnesota men have filed suit against Michigan-based ALS Enterprises Inc., the company that makes and markets Scent-Lok and ScentBlocker hunting clothing. Named as co-defendants are companies and retailers licensed to produce similar garments, including Gander Mountain, Cabela’s, Bass Pro Shops and Browning.
The suit alleges conspiracy and deception by the defendants.
“Consumers have been duped into spending significant amounts of money on a product that does not work as represented,” the suit states.
But according to the Star-Tribune article, Mike Andrews, vice president of marketing for ALS, defends the company’s products and says the suit is totally without merit.
“We’ve done years of research...we have hundreds of testimonials from consumers over the years,” he said. “We know it works. And we’re excited about the opportunity to prove to the world once and for all how effective our product is.”
If the plaintiffs get their wish, ALS may indeed be forced to prove just that.
The suit was filed September 13 by four Minnesota hunters who purchased the ALS-licensed apparel--Mike Buetow of Shakopee, Theodore Carlson of Edina, Gary Richardson Jr. of St. Paul and Joe Rohrbach of Shakopee. Not surprisingly, attorneys say they will seek class-action status for the suit, alleging that “tens of thousands” of Minnesota hunters have been deceived by the defendants into buying millions of dollars of the clothing advertised as odor-eliminating.
Questions and doubt surrounding the legitimacy and performance of scent-blocking hunting clothing have swirled around the hunting community since the apparel first hit the market in the mid-1990s.
It was probably inevitable that sooner or later lawyers and courts would become involved in the controversy.
Stay tuned on this one, Newshounders!








I'm starting a new company that will keep 100% of your scent out of the woods. I can guarantee 100% success if you follow my advice. Here goes (and I'm not charging you for it).
Stay out of the woods.
That's the only way to 100% guarantee that you will be scent free. These clothing companies will have lawyers and data supporting their side, these people who filed the suit will have lawyers and data supporting their side. In the end, the lawyers get the money, the companies are damaged and the plaintiffs are screwed. Why bother?
If you don't want to wear a carbon suit, don't. Do they work? Apparently enough people think they do, or these companies wouldn't be in business. Do they work 100% of the time. Apparently not or people wouldn't be bitchin' and filing lawsuits.
What's next? How about suing the deer lure companies and the call companies for failing to attract deer everytime you use their products too!
There are no 100% guarantees in hunting products. Never have been, never will be. The only 100% guarantee in this situation is that the lawyers are trying to make money. That's guaranteed!
Posted by: jstreet | September 24, 2007 at 01:58 PM
Scent Lok Patent - Rejected By The Patent Office
On 9/13/07 the United States Patent Office posted a "Final Rejection Mailed" notice on their web site for Patent # 90007331, which WAS the "double patented" application of Scent Lok for activated carbon clothing for use while hunting. It is illegal to patent something that has already been patented.
What does this "Patent rejection" mean for those companies who have been paying royalties to Scent Lok, or for those companies who have an agreement with Scent Lok, or for those companies who have been bankrupted by Scent Lok for infringing on the now rejected patent application of Scent Lok? It may mean that Scent Lok's demand for royalties for the past 16 years was never enforceable.
The consequences now - who knows? Maybe new technology, with lower clothing prices, for you hunters.
You can find this Patent rejection at: http://www.uspto.gov/ebc/index.html and click on View "Public PAIR". On the next page check the "Application Number" circle, and then type 90007331 in the "*Enter Number" box. You can then click the "Image File Wrapper" and "Transaction History" tabs at the top of the page to view more information.
Posted by: T.R. Michels | September 30, 2007 at 10:07 AM
Scent Lok did not have a booth at the Archery Show, one of the largest wholesale buying shows of the year!
Although I did not attend this show I have it on good authority that speculations arose that Scent Lok (which traditionally has a huge booth at this show) did not attend this very important buying show, because they did not want to answer questions about their "rejected patent application", the on-going lawsuit, the efficacy of their product to eliminate human odors, or its ability to be regenerated. There are also rumors that, in the near future, Scent Lok may not be the huge industry player that they have been in the past.
Posted by: T. R. Michels | January 16, 2008 at 01:30 PM
Does anyone know how this all worked out?
Posted by: WifeShopping | December 17, 2008 at 10:30 PM