This page has been moved to http://www.outdoorlife.com/blogs/gun-shots
If your browser doesn’t redirect you to the new location, please visit The Gun Shots at its new location: www.outdoorlife.com/blogs/gun-shots.
Safety First
I was using a prototype rifle the other day—a semi-automatic .17 HMR—that I was rapidly warming to. I had done some shooting with it for accuracy and, as always, was amazed at both the small groups the .17 HMR is capable of producing and the absolutely ruinous effect that any amount of wind has on those small bullets.
I was shooting at 100 yards and had just cranked off three 5-shot groups from a bench setup. My first group was shot in a stiff, variable breeze, during the second group the air was dead-still and while shooting the third group the wind couldn’t really make up its mind, blowing a bit but without any real conviction.
After I pulled the target I was pleased by what I saw. The first group was a bit of a scattered mess, just over two inches in size. The second group was a tiny sub-inch-sized cluster of .17-caliber holes. The third group was somewhere in between the two. All was well in the world.
Having finished that data-gathering “work” I settled in to have some fun. Loading the 10-shot magazine as rapidly as possible I started plinking. At the range where I was shooting a number of targets were begging to be pinged. A metal ram silhouette at 200-yards attracted most of my wrath. Holding just over its back I sent one 17-grain bullet after another screaming into its metal hide.
I also spied a number of clay targets that had been scattered across the hillside at different ranges. Those standing on their sides presented fat, easy targets and I soon reduced them to bits of orange shards. The clays lying on edge and in the grass proved to be much tougher quarry. Happily, with the weight of the bull-barreled rifle I was able to see where my bullets were striking and could quickly make adjustments to my hold.
No target there was safe.
I had taken a bead on one clay out there on the hill and as I shot I heard an extra loud bang and felt a stinging sensation on my face. Looking down I noticed the rifle was no longer in one piece. The magazine had blown out of the stock and smoke was curling ominously from various points on the rifle.
My first thought was “this ain’t right.” My second was “thank god I’m wearing shooting glasses.”
To cut to the chase, it appeared that the amount of fouling generated by the .17 HMR, which is considerable indeed, had built up to the point where the cartridges were unable to fully chamber. The head of that last cartridge was protruding just enough so that when I fired it exploded and instead of those gasses sending the bullet down the barrel they blew the head off the cartridge and shot the magazine out of the rifle. Why the rifle fired when it wasn’t in full battery is a good question and one that the rifle maker—who I won’t name here because the rifle is a prototype after all—needs to settle before going into full production.
One good piece of news from this is that the rifle at least failed in the correct manner, directing the gasses down and away from me. I consider myself very lucky, however, that I wasn’t gripping the stock with my hand placed underneath the magazine.
Recovered empties, which showed considerable signs of bulging around the head, confirmed that pressures had been progressively building in the chamber. I extracted the bullet from the barrel—it had lodged about a half-inch up the bore—and plucked a number of small bits of plastic from my face after the fact.
All in all it is great object lesson in why one should never shoot without proper eye and ear protection.
—John Snow









Am I incorrect in thinking that excesive fouling has always been a complaint against the .17 caliber cartridges? It seems like I remember reading something about the 17 Remington's tendency to foul rapidly as far back as the early 1980s.
I was somewhat surprised when the new .17 caliber rifles showed up on the market.
Posted by: Gary | March 06, 2008 at 04:21 PM
I had a Remington 597 fire out of battery in a similar style. The mag stayed in place, but my right hand was sprayed with powder and a bit of brass. The extractor hook was destroyed/missing ... and the gun was out of service for quite some time. It's been fixed, but I don't trust it like I used to...
Posted by: B. Cameron | March 06, 2008 at 04:49 PM
The .17 ,being a rim fire ,depending how the round leaves the mag. can be struck by the bolt on the rim.. The rimfire rounds should always be stripped from the mag, in as near horizontal position as possible to prevent the bolt from striking the rim.. Id appear to have detonated prior to being seated in the chamber. Had that been something that could have been reloaded it would seem to have detonated like a very light load, but that was not the case here...If we knew what make this was we could observe the cartridge as it is stripped from the mag. Yes, you were lucky to have had shooting glasses on...Asyou say, SAFTY FIRST. I have a new Marlin ,heave barrel and I'm going right now to check how the rounds comes out of the Mag.
Thanks for the warning.
Posted by: sarg | March 07, 2008 at 08:33 PM
I have a Remington 597 22. Lr. should I be worried.
Posted by: Rush M. Jones | March 11, 2008 at 01:34 PM
Rush, you probably need not worry, They were shooting a PROTOTYPE. I DON'T THINK YOURS IS A PROTO TYPE.. WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE OTHER RIFLE, THE ROUND PROBABLY DIDN'T raise up enough or caught and the bolt Crushed the primer. Don't worry.
Posted by: sarg | March 12, 2008 at 05:37 PM
thanks.
Posted by: Rush M. Jones | March 14, 2008 at 02:07 PM